Views about government aid to the poor among who say philosophy/reason is their primary source of guidance on what's right and wrong by region (2014) Switch to: Region among who say philosophy/reason is their primary source of guidance on what's right and wrong by views about government aid to the poor
% of who say philosophy/reason is their primary source of guidance on what's right and wrong who say government aid to the poor…
| Region | Does more harm than good | Does more good than harm | Neither/both equally | Don't know | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast | 29% | 66% | 3% | 1% | 820 |
| South | 36% | 59% | 4% | 1% | 1,233 |
| Midwest | 36% | 59% | 3% | 1% | 734 |
| West | 29% | 65% | 4% | 2% | 1,094 |
Sample sizes and margins of error vary from subgroup to subgroup, from year to year and from state to state. You can see the sample size for the estimates in this chart on rollover or in the last column of the table. And visit this table to see approximate margins of error for a group of a given size. Readers should always bear in mind the approximate margin of error for the group they are examining when making comparisons with other groups or assessing the significance of trends over time. For full question wording, see the survey questionnaire.
Learn More: Does more harm than good, Does more good than harm
