Belief in absolute standards for right and wrong among adults who say that government aid to the poor does more good than harm by metro area (2014) Switch to: Metro area among adults who say that government aid to the poor does more good than harm by belief in existence of standards for right and wrong

% of adults who say that government aid to the poor does more good than harm who say…

Metro areaThere are clear standards for what is right and wrongRight or wrong depends on the situationNeither/both equallyDon't knowSample size
Atlanta Metro Area27%72%1%< 1%242
Baltimore Metro Area18%80%1%< 1%133
Boston Metro Area16%81%2%< 1%294
Chicago Metro Area22%76%1%1%489
Dallas/Fort Worth Metro Area27%71%2%< 1%296
Detroit Metro Area37%59%2%2%186
Houston Metro Area26%72%1%1%239
Los Angeles Metro Area22%75%1%1%609
Miami Metro Area27%71%1%1%262
Minneapolis/St. Paul Metro Area26%74%< 1%< 1%196
New York City Metro Area18%79%1%1%1,021
Philadelphia Metro Area27%72%< 1%< 1%409
Phoenix Metro Area28%68%1%2%167
Pittsburgh Metro Area25%74%< 1%1%119
Providence Metro Area25%73%2%< 1%195
Riverside, CA Metro Area27%68%2%2%189
San Diego Metro Area30%69%< 1%1%169
San Francisco Metro Area25%72%2%1%338
Seattle Metro Area21%78%1%< 1%207
St. Louis Metro Area25%73%1%1%138
Tampa Metro Area20%78%2%< 1%159
Washington, DC Metro Area23%76%< 1%< 1%576
Sample sizes and margins of error vary from subgroup to subgroup, from year to year and from state to state. You can see the sample size for the estimates in this chart on rollover or in the last column of the table. And visit this table to see approximate margins of error for a group of a given size. Readers should always bear in mind the approximate margin of error for the group they are examining when making comparisons with other groups or assessing the significance of trends over time. For full question wording, see the survey questionnaire.

Learn More: There are clear standards for what is right and wrong, Right or wrong depends on the situation